http://fresnozionism.org/2008/05/us-may-indeed-attack-iran-but-not-for-israel/ A pro-Israel voice from California's Central Valley Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:48:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://fresnozionism.org/2008/05/us-may-indeed-attack-iran-but-not-for-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-6112 Shalom Freedman Wed, 21 May 2008 07:27:48 +0000 http://fresnozionism.org/archives/931#comment-6112 I also believe there is a fairly good chance of an American attack. One reason is that it if it does not happen the Bush Administration will gone down in history as the one which allowed Iran to become a nuclear power. The incumbent will in fact face a fait accompli. Bush's concern for his own place in history may lead him to take on Iran. Also to really win the War on Terror Iran the principal state- sponsor of Terror has to be stopped. If Iran could be soundly drubbed it would go a long way to taking the wind out of Radical Islam. However this does not mean I personally look forward to an American attack. Israel after all is the one who is going to pay the major price for any U.S. action. The missles Syria, Hizbollah, the rockets of Hamas will be headed towards Israel.So will the Shihab - 3 and we do not know what kind of warhead it will have. Outgoing Air- Force Commander Eliezer Shkeidy said in a coming war thousands of missiles will come down on Israel. They will should the U.S. attack Iran. And will the U.S. give Israel advance warning? Will there be coordination and an Israeli effort to preempt the Syrian and Hizbollah missiles? All alternatives now look bad. The thought is that nonetheless preemption of a nuclear Iran is necessary- and that the U.S. has the means to do this more efficiently ( And absorb the political heat better) than Israel. I also believe there is a fairly good chance of an American attack. One reason is that it if it does not happen the Bush Administration will gone down in history as the one which allowed Iran to become a nuclear power. The incumbent will in fact face a fait accompli.
Bush’s concern for his own place in history may lead him to take on Iran.
Also to really win the War on Terror Iran the principal state- sponsor of Terror has to be stopped. If Iran could be soundly drubbed it would go a long way to taking the wind out of Radical Islam.
However this does not mean I personally look forward to an American attack. Israel after all is the one who is going to pay the major price for any U.S. action. The missles Syria, Hizbollah, the rockets of Hamas will be headed towards Israel.So will the Shihab – 3 and we do not know what kind of warhead it will have.
Outgoing Air- Force Commander Eliezer Shkeidy said in a coming war thousands of missiles will come down on Israel. They will should the U.S. attack Iran. And will the U.S. give Israel advance warning? Will there be coordination and an Israeli effort to preempt the Syrian and Hizbollah missiles?
All alternatives now look bad. The thought is that nonetheless preemption of a nuclear Iran is necessary- and that the U.S. has the means to do this more efficiently ( And absorb the political heat better) than Israel.

]]>