Archive for January, 2007

The two-state mirage

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

The US and Europe, along with the Olmert government and Mahmoud Abbas all officially espouse a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians. The great majority of Americans, if they care, would agree. For many people, a Jewish or Arab ‘extremist’ is just someone who doesn’t accept the two-state program.

But a few moments of thought indicate that a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank would not be viable or stable. The idea is only attractive because alternatives appear unthinkable.

(more…)

Jews like these

Tuesday, January 2nd, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

Some of the most effective anti-Israel propaganda lately comes from Jews. Some time ago, I wrote a piece titled With Jews like these, who needs Arabs? It doesn’t sound so clever anymore.

(more…)

Kofi’s replacement

Monday, January 1st, 2007

If the issues with the conflicts between Israel and Palestine go well, [resolutions of] other issues in the Middle East, including Lebanon, Iran, Iraq and Syria, are likely to follow suit. ” — Ban Ki-Moon, new UN Secretary General [Jerusalem Post].

I’m trying to picture this. Israel goes back to green lines, allows ‘refugees’ to ‘return’, and suddenly Lebanese Christians and Muslims, Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites kiss and make up?

The Post goes on to say that although Ban has visited Israel, “he is not known to have developed expertise on the Middle East”.

Indeed.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Sovereignity and chess

Monday, January 1st, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

Israel is backing off on the plan to create (or expand) a settlement in the Jordan valley. Although a good argument can be made that Israel has the right to do this, the whole affair displays the incompetence of the government.

What did they think would be the reaction of the US and Europe? Of course it will be, “you can’t do this”. And what has the government’s reaction consistently been to US pressure: “yes, boss”.

So, since bowing to such pressure is another erosion of sovereignity, Israel should either not expand the settlement or not give in once the expansion has been announced.

A novice chessplayer soon learns to look ahead several moves. Olmert’s government can’t seem to look ahead by one.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Cruelty surrounds Shalit deal

Monday, January 1st, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

Noam Shalit, Gilad’s father, “knows by now not to get excited by every tale of Gilad being released soon”. Every day there’s a new report; the deal is on, the deal is off. Hamas has reportedly demanded as many as 1,500 prisoners to be traded for Shalit, many of them convicted murderers and including the assassin of Israeli cabinet minister Rehavam Ze’evi.

The negotiations are following Middle Eastern bazaar rules in which a powerful desire of one party is exploited by repeatedly dangling and snatching away the object of desire to raise the price. There is enormous cruelty to Gilad and his family, but of course Hamas doesn’t care.

In years past, Israel did not negotiate with terrorists, and they should not do so now. Acceptance of a deal means that there are no consequences for murdering Jews, since there can (will) always be another kidnapping and another prisoner release. It means that Israel is weak and will not respond to terrorism. It means that Israel is not a sovereign state. Of course, this policy is also clear from Israel’s ‘restraint’ in the face of Kassam missile attacks.

Israel should implement a death penalty for those convicted of terrorist murders, and Israel should respond to kidnappings and terrorism with military force that will not be ‘restrained’ until hostages are returned and missile fire stops.

Otherwise the long-term price will be far higher.

Technorati Tags: , ,