Archive for January, 2007

Daniel Pipes on the Road Map

Wednesday, January 17th, 2007

The plan was born a bureaucratic monstrosity; of its myriad faults, grown perhaps the most fundamental was its assumption that if only the Palestinians were given just a tad more of this or that, they would finally recognize the benefits of harmonious co-existence with a Jewish state of Israel. Not to have learned by now that Palestinians have larger and more aggressive ambitions than to live side-by-side with Israel implies living in a state of denial.

Emphasis mine. How long will it take for the West to learn this? One suspects that the US State Dept. knows it well enough, but is trying to keep it secret.

Read the whole article here.

Carter’s real goal: to weaken Jewish influence in the US

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007

Bradley Burston argues that Jimmy Carter’s book was intended primarily to strike at the organized Jewish pro-Israel community:

Best of all, from Carter’s standpoint, is the blistering flak he has taken from an A-list of prominent American Jews. The criticism grants weight to Carter’s carefully worded accusations as to Jewish control of the American media, a self-fulfilling charge if ever there was one, and one sure to keep the hardcovers flying off bookstore shelves.

Echoing Mearsheimer and Walt, Carter hammers on the Jewish conspiracy to prevent criticism of Israel (here in an LA Times Op-ed):

The many controversial issues concerning Palestine and the path to peace for Israel are intensely debated among Israelis and throughout other nations — but not in the United States. For the last 30 years, I have witnessed and experienced the severe restraints on any free and balanced discussion of the facts. This reluctance to criticize any policies of the Israeli government is because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the American-Israel Political Action Committee and the absence of any significant contrary voices.

The sudden prevalence of this point of view smells like a carefully crafted public relations offensive. As I’ve written before, the combination of this with the mysterious FBI sting against AIPAC and the new influence of the Baker-Scowcroft gang seems all of a piece. My feeling is that Israel’s enemies know how important American support is to Israel, and how critical American Jewish influence has been to keep that support. And they want to stop it.
Recently, more and more has come out about Carter’s being a paid lackey of the Saudis. And Baker’s law firm represents the Saudi government. I think it would be useful to look for Saudi connections in other places, like Mearsheimer and Walt. And it would be instructive if we could find out who initiated the AIPAC sting.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

A world without Nasser

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007

Michael Oren answers readers’ questions in Ha’aretz:

Many historians would probably list Harry Truman’s recognition of Israel in May 1948 as one of America’s most fateful decisions in the Middle East. A more seismic event, I think, was Dwight D. Eisenhower’s decision to support Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser in the 1956 Suez Crisis. Though Nasser had plotted against Arab moderates and had violated international agreements by nationalizing the Suez Canal, Eisenhower sided with the Soviet Union – this while Soviet tanks were crushing freedom-fighters in Hungary – in rescuing Nasser from certain defeat at the hands of Britain, France, and Israel. A vastly strengthened Nasser once again turned his Soviet arms against Arab moderates and ultimately aimed them at Israel. But imagine if Eisenhower had just stepped back and let Nasser fall. There might not have been wars in 1967 or 1973, no occupied territories, no intifadas or Hamas. Minus Nasser, the Middle East might today look radically different.

There’s lots more fascinating stuff in this Q&A.

Russia sells sophisticated air defense missiles to Iran

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007

Tor-M1The Jerusalem Post reports that Russia has delivered Tor-M1 air defense missile systems to Iran. The contract calls for a total of 29 missile systems at a cost of $700 million. The United States opposed the sale, apparently to no effect.

The system is designed to protect installations against cruise missiles, such as the US Tomahawk, fixed-wing aircraft, and precision-guided munitions. It would fit perfectly as part of a system to defend nuclear installations against an attack from the US or Israel. Although the UN has voted sanctions against Iran as a result of her defiant pursuit of nuclear weapons, they don’t appear to apply to non-nuclear defensive weapons systems.

Barghouti and the “prisoners’ document”

Monday, January 15th, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

I suspect that Condoleeza Rice had a hand in this:Barghouti

JERUSALEM, Jan. 15 (UPI) — Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh Monday hinted that Palestinian Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti’s jail term ought to be shortened.

Barghouti is serving five life sentences on charges of involvement in assassinations during the intifada, or the Palestinian uprising.

However, from his prison cell he has been involved in Fatah affairs and in drafting a Palestinian document that implied recognition of Israel, acceptance of the pre-1967 lines and limitations on the use violence. Security prisoners belonging to other parties, including Hamas, have signed it.

(more…)