Archive for June, 2007

The road to peace

Thursday, June 14th, 2007

So Hamas has taken over Gaza and the Palestinian Unity Government is essentially dead. Is this good or bad for Israel? Some commentators, like Ami Isseroff, think it’s awful:

What is happening in Gaza, the destruction of the Fatah by the Hamas, is an unmitigated disaster for United States and Western policy, and a grave threat to Israel…

A relatively small force of Hamas Islamist extremists are liquidating the possibility of a two state solution. Any possibility of peaceful coexistence is being swept into the dustbin.

I’m not so sure. Was Mahmoud Abbas and Fatah a partner to negotiate a two-state solution? Even Isseroff apparently isn’t sure:

No Israeli government could agree to Mr. Abbas’s terms of peace, which include return of Palestinian refugees and surrender of all of East Jerusalem, including Israeli national institutions there such as the Hebrew University on Mt Scopus, the historic Jewish quarter of the Old city and the Western (Wailing Wall).

As he points out, Israel was dragged kicking and screaming by the US to cooperate with the Hamas-controlled PA. But he adds,

…Israel did not oblige those who wanted it to grant more concessions in order to strengthen Mahmoud Abbas. It is unlikely that any such concessions would have really helped Palestinian moderates however. Every concession that Israel made was always seen as a victory for “armed resistance” and not for moderation. At the same time, every concession and every offer were always denigrated as too little, any number of prisoners offered as a confidence building gesture was considered to be a Zionist trick.

Let us remember also that the so-called ‘moderate’ Fatah has a ‘military wing’, the al-Aksa Martyrs brigades, who cooperated in this years’ only successful suicide bombing, in Eilat, and who have never stopped trying to kill Israelis regardless of Abbas’ words.

Let us remember that Fatah is the creature of Yasser Arafat, the spiritual and political heir of Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Nazi Mufti of Jerusalem. Abbas was Arafat’s right-hand man. What can we expect of such an organization, such a man?

What does Fatah do for Israel? Here are some things:

  • By allowing itself to be labeled ‘moderate’, it provides an excuse for international donors, who wish to make points with their oil suppliers and domestic Muslims, to funnel money to the terrorist militias.
  • By pretending to be a peace partner, it provides a lever by which the US and others can force Israel to make dangerous security concessions which can then be exploited by the terrorist militias.
  • By appearing to be a counterforce against Hamas, it provides an excuse to pump even more weapons into the hands of the terrorist militias.

Hamas is no more hostile to the Jewish state than Fatah; it is just more honest about its intentions, more efficient, better motivated, more effectively led, and less corrupt. Because of this it is more dangerous, but it also adds a measure of clarity to the struggle, which in the long run might spell the difference between survival and destruction for Israel.

The hard fact that many people do not wish to face is that today there is no shortcut to peace for Israel. There is no partner such that, if only the right formulation could be found, if only Israel would be willing to give up a little more, peace would be at hand.

Today it’s necessary to prepare for a long, difficult struggle (as if it hasn’t been long enough and difficult enough until now) in which Israel’s enemies must be defeated and thereby come to understand that the only real solution is coexistence.

Israel made a historic mistake when she signed on to the Oslo process with the evil, duplicitous Arafat. As a result, the conflict was extended, not shortened, possibly by decades. But there’s no going back.

For the foreseeable future, the road to peace runs through conflict, not compromise.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Sometimes it doesn’t help to not be a Jew

Thursday, June 14th, 2007

Hamas men are displaying remarkable brutality as they cement their conquest of Gaza:

At least 25 Palestinians were killed and 80 were wounded as Hamas fighters overran two of Fatah’s most important security installations in the Gaza Strip on Thursday. Witnesses said the victors dragged vanquished gunmen from the building and shot them to death gangland-style in the street in front of their families…

A witness, who identified himself only as Amjad, said men were killed before their wives and children.

“They are executing them one by one,” Amjad said in a telephone interview, declining to give his full name for fear of reprisals. “They are carrying one of them on their shoulders, putting him on a sand dune, turning him around and shooting.” — Jerusalem Post

Hamas fighter with captured weaponsHamas claims that they have found documents indicating that Fatah was working with the CIA. Of course the US has been up front about providing aid for Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah organization. The surprise is not that the CIA was involved, but that they continued to supply weapons to Fatah when the end of the story should have been obvious for months (thanks to Conflict Blotter for the photo, captured from Hamas TV).

Fatah officials here confirmed that Hamas had seized large amounts of weapons and military equipment belonging to Abbas’s security forces in the Gaza Strip. Some of the weapons were supplied to the PA in recent weeks by Egypt and Jordan as part of a US security plan to boost Fatah-controlled forces.

Hamas said it had seized thousands of M-16 and Kalashnikov rifles and pistols, communication equipment, armored vehicles, trucks, binoculars, military outfits, tents, sleeping bags, hand grenades, mortars and documents.
Jerusalem Post

Fatah’s Mahmoud Abbas ordered his security forces to respond only defensively and not to attack Hamas directly, and he is reported to have spoken to Hamas leader and Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, who agreed to jointly call for a cease-fire. This strategy appears to have been a serious mistake — unless Abbas has made some kind of deal to save his own skin.

Lots of Fatah officials have not been as successful. Here’s a description of one Fatah man’s last phone call:

Hamas has stormed the home of Jamal Abu Jideyan, general secretary of Fatah in Northern Gaza and an Al Aqsa Brigades commander, and assassinated him. About 20 minutes ago we were listening to Sawt Al Hurriya, a Palestinian radio station, as Jideyan’s brother called into the station frantic. Hamas militants had surrounded the family’s home in the Jabbaliya refugee camp and had fired 16 RPG rounds at the home, with 35 family members inside, he said. “They’re firing at us, firing RPGs, firing mortars. We’re not Jews,” he screamed into the telephone live on air, gun fire bursting in the background.

Abu Jideyan himself was dragged outside and shot, his head almost removed from his body by bullets.

As it stands today, there are two Palestinian entities for Israel to deal with, one in Gaza that is pure Hamas, and one in the West Bank which is only Hamas-dominated.

For now.

Dry Bones: Blabbermouth in Gaza

Thank you, Mr. Dry Bones, and also Beth for finding this for me!

Technorati Tags: , ,

A Mighty Heart: Review

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

A Mighty Heart, directed by Michael Winterbottom, starring Angelina Jolie, Dan Futterman, Archie Panjabi. Based on the book “A Mighty Heart: the Brave Life and Death of my Husband Danny Pearl”, by Mariane Pearl and Sarah Crichton.

Jolie as Mariane PearlWhen I heard that a PR firm was distributing passes to a pre-release screening of a film about Daniel Pearl, I thought: this is the last film I want to see. Free or not. Angelina Jolie or not.

As you probably know, Pearl was the Jewish Wall Street Journal reporter who was kidnapped in Pakistan in 2002 by al-Qaeda linked jihadists and beheaded shortly thereafter.

I was afraid of two things when I sat down in the theater. One was that the film would show Pearl’s murder, or even dwell on his captivity. I’ve forced myself to watch enough Jihadist footage to last several lifetimes; I don’t need any more.

The other was that it would have a sappy ‘message’ about the ambiguity of good and evil. Or even one about how we are all somehow responsible for terrorism.

But none of this happened. The film focused on Mariane Pearl, Daniel’s wife, during the month between his kidnapping and the appearance of the videotape of his murder. It didn’t editorialize, exaggerate, introduce irrelevant subplots, invent snappy dialog, have a “love interest” (except of course Mariane and Danny) or include gratuitous violence or sex. The bloodiest scene showed the birth of their son Adam, three months after Danny’s death.

The film simply and sparely portrayed Mariane’s experiences and her feelings, the efforts to trace the kidnappers and find Danny, the ups and downs of false hopes and the final, terrible loss.

Jolie’s acting, the Pakistani street scenes, and the lack of clichés give the film an authenticity so often lacking in Hollywood products.

Is it a good film? Yes. Just don’t plan to do anything for a couple of hours afterwards.

Technorati Tags: , ,

The de Soto report

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

The UN is a member of the stupidly-named ‘Quartet’ for the Middle East peace process, along with the US, Russia, and the EU. Alvaro de Soto, whose title was (really) “Under-Secretary-General, United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and Personal Representative of the Secretary-General to the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority, Envoy to the Quartet” has written an End of Mission Report after two years of service.

(more…)

Diplomacy and war

Tuesday, June 12th, 2007

The secret communications between Israel and Syria seem to have produced public results:

“Syria is prepared to renew talks based upon the land for peace principle, without preconditions, to bring about stability and security in the region,” [Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Ahmad] Arnous said.

The Syrian diplomat, who made the statement following a Damascus meeting with Greek Foreign Minister Dora Bakoyanni, also said that Syria was determined to regain the Golan.

“President Assad is perfectly straightforward regarding Syria’s aspirations to renew negotiations based on the rubrics of the Madrid Conference,” he said. — Jerusalem Post

The Madrid Conference took place in 1991, and affirmed the principle of talks between Israel and Syria with a view to trading the Golan for a peace treaty. Talks under this framework continued during the 1990’s, ultimately failing to reach a resolution because of disagreements about precise borders and security arrangements.

Diplomacy is war by other means, to turn von Clausewitz’s famous remark around, and make no mistake: this particular diplomacy is closely tied up with war and the possibility of war.

Israel’s position will no doubt be the same as it has always been: “sign a real peace treaty that includes recognition and full normalization of relations, and you can have the Golan”.

Syria’s position, as I imagine it, will be “Hizbullah has 20,000 rockets and stronger defenses than they did when they beat you in 2006; we have more and better missiles which can strike anywhere in Israel as well as vastly improved antitank and antiaircraft weapons. Give us the Golan”.

Of course they will probably try to say it more diplomatically, since this is after all diplomacy.

Technorati Tags: , ,