Archive for July, 2007

Goodbye Farfour, here comes Nahoul

Sunday, July 15th, 2007

Hamas TV has replaced the murdered Farfour the mouse with a new character, a bee named Nahoul who plans to take revenge on the “enemies of Allah, the killer of the prophets and of the innocent children” as well as the killers of his cousin Farfour.

One interesting difference is that Nahoul, unlike the defenseless Farfour — who was beaten to death by a hateful Israeli who wants to steal his land — has a stinger. We will see how this plays out.

What chills me about this is that the program is aimed at little children. I remember watching Howdy Doody as a child of six and passionately following Howdy’s struggle to defeat the nefarious plans of Mr. Bluster. Of course the worst thing that Mr. Bluster ever did was to scheme to take over Howdy’s circus.

What they are learning is that Israelis and Jews are horribly, irredeemably evil creatures who want to kill Palestinian children and steal their land. They are learning that the only way to redeem Palestine is through violent Jihad, and that the highest goal is martyrdom in its service. They are learning the value of revenge. And so on.

Looking at the history of Jews and Arabs in the land of Israel for the last 100+ years is depressing, because it’s clear that it’s coming down to this: us or them. There isn’t going to be peace until one side is gone.

Have all the failures to reach agreement in recent history been due to mistakes and miscalculations on one or both sides? Or is it something deeper? Something that keeps coming back, like Nahoul?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

A bullet or 31 for Hawatmeh

Saturday, July 14th, 2007

Nayef HawatmehOn May 15, 1974 three terrorists from the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), a group headed by Nayef Hawatmeh, infiltrated across the Lebanese border into the town of Ma’alot, where they murdered 31 Israelis, including 26 children in the Netiv Meir elementary school. The ‘reason’ for the attack was supposed to be a response to the “shuttle diplomacy” of Henry Kissinger, who was attempting to negotiate peace between Israel and the Arab nations.

Hawatmeh and the DFLP are now hosted by Syria. They have been responsible for various other terrorist acts, but since the mid-1990’s, their ‘military’ capabilities in the territories have declined. Maybe they’re getting old.

The Olmert government has apparently decided that, in the name of “strengthening Abbas”, it’s time to forgive and forget, or at least to forget:

In a move aimed at helping Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas gain approval of the new PA government, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will approve allowing Nayef Hawatmeh, the Damascus-based leader of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), to travel to Ramallah on Wednesday to participate in a meeting of the PLO’s central assembly…

Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilna’i said on Friday that Israel should allow Hawatmeh into Ramallah since this could help strengthen Abbas in face of the growing Hamas threat in the Gaza Strip. — Jerusalem Post

The string of concessions, pardons, abasements, and humiliations that Israel seems bound to suffer in order to “bolster Abbas against Hamas” seems to never end. Each step is worse than the preceding one, as Israel and the US arm, finance, and appease the Fatah terrorists in an attempt to create a counterforce to Hamas.

And it’s all for naught. Didn’t they learn anything from the disaster in the Gaza strip where the well-armed Fatah men were routed by the better organized and highly motivated Hamas forces? Everything we gave Fatah ended up in the hands of Hamas.

Don’t they understand that the more they support the corrupt Fatah, the less popular it becomes among Palestinians?

Fatah is not going to defeat Hamas, and even if it could it would not be an alternative, being in principle no less rejectionist than Hamas.

Better simply put a bullet or 31 in the back of Hawatmeh’s head, and announce the end of another terrorist murderer. That kind of action will probably have a much more positive effect on the ultimate outcome than any more ‘strengthening’ or ‘bolstering’ that we do for Abbas.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

A Freudian typo?

Saturday, July 14th, 2007

Dion Nissenbaum is the McClatchy news bureau chief in Jerusalem. He has a blog, called “Checkpoint Jerusalem“. Most newsmen try to be more or less objective, but it’s not too hard to see where his sympathies lie.

For example, he presents the release of kidnapped BBC reporter Alan Johnston as a humanitarian act by Hamas, rather than a cynical attempt to exploit the situation. And he doesn’t mention the ransom.

He doesn’t attempt to hide his dislike of the Israelis. Almost every article describes some horrific situation, and hints that it’s Israel’s fault:

The footage doesn’t show what was going on around Imad [Ghanem of Hamas TV] when he was first shot, but it clearly shows the cameraman being shot twice while laying injured on the ground and appearing to pose no danger.

It’s not clear who fired the shots, though Imad later said that the bullets came from an Israeli tank.

“The Israeli military’s repeated attacks on media and journalists during military operations are unacceptable and constitute violations of international humanitarian law,” said Reporters Without Borders.

But the best is either a Freudian typo or a deliberate bit of editorializing. Here’s Nissenbaum on Fourth of July celebrations held by American representatives in Israel:

There are essentially two events: One that caters to the Israeli side, held near Tel Aviv, and one that caters to the Palestinian side, held in Jerusalem.

The Independence Day celebration in Israel was held on July 3rd and hosted by U.S. Ambassador Richard Jones…

The Independence Day celebration in Jerusalem was hosted by Consul General Jacob Walles and was a much more low-key affair.

So we have one in Israel and one in Jerusalem. And Jerusalem is where?

Technorati Tags: , ,

Rumors of another deal with the devil

Saturday, July 14th, 2007

If this is true, it represents a new low in Israeli self-esteem and common sense:

Israel had agreed to cease arrest raids on Fatah-affiliated fugitives in the West Bank if they proved that they were ready to stop all terror activity against the Jewish state, al-Aksa Martyrs Brigade leaders told the Palestinian Ma’an news agency on Saturday.

Reportedly, 178 Palestinian fugitives from the West Bank would no longer be sought by security forces if they proved that they had ceased terrorist activity. Martyrs Brigades Jenin chief, Zakahriya Zubeidi, was said to be one of the names on the list.

Also on the list is Daoud Haji, one of two terrorists who participated in a 2002 attack against troops at the Ein Arik checkpoint. Six soldiers were murdered in the massacre when Haji and another terrorist stormed the checkpoint shooting both soldiers on guard and those sleeping in a near-by caravan. — Jerusalem Post (my emphasis)

Note that it’s not clear what they would have to prove. It is nonsensical, anyway, to ‘prove’ that you are “ready to stop” doing anything. What constitutes proof? I know someone who has ‘proved’ that she is “ready to stop” smoking a million times, but she still smokes.

This is supposedly being done because these terrorists are the Fatah elements most “dedicated to standing up against Hamas”. I don’t need to point out that despite their differences, the one thing that they do agree with Hamas about is their desire to kill Jews.

Deals with the devil always turn out badly. Let’s hope that this report is just wishful thinking on the part of the al-Aqsa terrorists.

Update [1436 PDT]: PM Olmert has confirmed that it’s true, although a spokesperson said that Zubeidi is not included.

“The agreement serves Israel’s interests in that the Fatah men on the list will lay down their arms and leave the cycle of terror,” a senior Israeli official said. — YNet

Of course. Thank goodness.

Update [15 July 0818 PDT]: Zubeidi will be pardoned after all.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Realistic solutions seem further away than ever

Friday, July 13th, 2007

Everyone wants a two-state solution:

The next few weeks are critical in reviving the Middle East peace process, Jordan’s King Abdullah II said Friday.

Abdullah spoke after a meeting with Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The two agreed that peace in the Middle East could only be achieved through a two-state solution. — Jerusalem Post

But what does this really mean?

Assuming that one of the two states is Israel, then probably the idea is that Israel will sign a peace treaty with the Abbas/Fayyed government in the West Bank.

Two states, yes, but no ‘solution’ in a real sense. About 43% of the Palestinian population lives in Hamastan (Gaza). Hamas also has influence in the West Bank, and despite the continued flow of money and arms to Abbas’ Fatah, is probably more capable in a military sense than Fatah. So what are the options?

Will Hamas see the light and evaporate, giving full control to Abbas? Hardly likely.

Will Hamas be isolated from the world and wither away? This seems to be what the US is hoping for. But it’s also not likely. Iran is happy to fund Hamas’ military budget, and certainly it will not be possible for the rest of the world to ignore the needs of the population. Israel cannot hermetically seal Gaza without creating a humanitarian crisis.

The most probable outcome is some kind of unity between the Palestinian factions, as favored by Egypt and Saudi Arabia. If this happens, there’s no doubt that Hamas, by virtue of the greater degree of commitment of its adherents, will come to dominate the regime. In that case, Israel will have a two-state solution in which her partner is a antisemitic, terrorist entity whose primary reason for being is to destroy her.

Another possibility is for Israel to crush Hamas militarily. There’s no doubt in my mind that there will soon be an opportunity, since Hamas is likely to join in the next flare-up instigated by Hezbollah, backed by Syria and Iran. Alternatively, Israel could try to preempt a two-front war by attacking Hamas now. This wouldn’t be easy nor would it be cheap in terms of lives, for both sides.

Of course, if Israel were to succeed in destroying Hamas, the question of who would fill the power vacuum arises. It’s not at all certain that it would be somebody friendlier than Hamas.

Realistic solutions — for any number of states — are hard to come by.

Technorati Tags: , , ,