Archive for January, 2009

From the folks that gave us the Armenian Genocide

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

News item:

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Tuesday reiterated his harsh criticism against Israel Operation Cast Lead aimed at restoring calm to the South of Israel.

Speaking to the Turkish Parliament in Ankara in a session that was carried by local television, Erdogan said his words were “less harsh than the white phosphorous shells used by the Israeli army.” [The IDF categorically denies using WP ammunition — ed.]

“Whoever does not express resentment over the killing of civilians, including women and children, loses his self respect,” Erdogan was quoted by Israel Radio as saying.

Erdogan said his criticism did not stem from anti-Semitism and emphasized that in the past he had termed anti-Semitism a crime against humanity.

But he then continued to say that “media outlets supported by Jews are disseminating false reports on what happens in Gaza, finding unfounded excuses to justify targeting of schools, mosques and hospitals.” [Watch IDF video here of weapons found in a mosque yesterday — ed.]

No antisemitism, just a problem with the Jewish media. I see.

But the situation is more worrisome than just a certain crudeness of expression on the part of Erdogan. It appears that Turkey has joined Iran as a country for which antisemitism has become a matter of policy.

Here is the text of an email received by our contributor Barry Rubin from a reliable correspondent in Turkey:

The Prime Minister in Turkey has encouraged hatred against Israel in his speeches which has become obvious anti-Semitic propaganda among the general public.

There are people around the clock besieging the Israeli consulate in Istanbul shouting their hatred against Israel and Jewish people. All around Istanbul billboards are full of propaganda posters against Israel like; “Moses, even this is not written in your book” and “Israel Stop this Crime.” On the streets the people are writing such graffiti as:  “Kill Jews,” “Kill Israel,” “Israel should no longer exist in the Middle East,” and “Stop Israeli Massacre.”

The week-end before, some people wrote, “We will kill you” on the door of one of the biggest synagogues in Izmir resulted in the closing down of synagogues. Near Istanbul University, a group put a huge poster on the door of a shop owned by a Jew: “Do not buy from here, since this shop is owned by a Jew.” A group put posters on his wall saying that: “Jews and Armenians are not allowed but dogs are allowed.”  Some young people are even threatening others with violence if they are seen as pro-Israel in social networking websites such as Facebook and Hi5.

The document attached is the official statement by the minister of education stating that tomorrow [January 14] at 11am in all the high schools and primary schools the students will pay homage to the women and children dead during the war and furthermore, the teachers of art will organize the session of painting and writing on the subject: “Humanity Drama in Palestine” and the winners will receive awards.

The Jewish community can do nothing in response to what has been going on for the last few weeks, except giving vague statements that the Turkish Jewish Community does not want the war to be continued any more.

We have previously faced some strong reaction regarding previous operations in Gaza and the West Bank but this time is really different from former ones. I feel open anti-Semitism and hatred from all these people. Nobody understood, even some widely read columnists in Turkey are writing things that lead all these groups toward this hatred becoming much more dangerous day by day.

But I know one thing: that the world should know about the widespread and openly anti-Semitic propaganda which far exceeds anything happening in Europe.

Keep in mind that what’s happening in Europe isn’t chopped liver, either. Erdogan has been described as a ‘moderate Islamist’, which is apparently an oxymoron.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Who killed the “peace process”?

Monday, January 12th, 2009

Who killed the “peace process”? Not Israel — it was dead long before the Gaza war.

The Peace Process is in Jeopardy? I Wonder Why!
by Barry Rubin

Whatever became of reality, at least in analyzing the Middle East? Consider the following:

With every image of the dead in Gaza inflaming people across the Arab world, Egyptian and Jordanian officials are worried that they see a fundamental tenet of the Middle East peace process slipping away: the so-called two-state solution, an independent Palestinian state coexisting with Israel. — NY Times

So begins an article in the New York Times that explains the peace process is failing and the two-state solution slipping away. It is one more example of an obsessive narrative whose key premise is this: the Palestinians can never be responsible for anything.

Of course, the Arab world’s public reaction to the Gaza war is not pushing it in a more moderate direction. Yet on a governmental level — and compared to past such crises including the 1982 Lebanon war, 2000-2005 Palestinian intifada, and 2006 Israel-Hizballah war — most governments have come as close to being pro-Israel as you are ever going to see them. Privately, they make clear they want Hamas beaten. Publicly, they are far more reserved in their speech and passive in their reactions.

That’s the big story. As for the Arab street, that much-exaggerated phenomenon, since when have governments followed its dictate?

Yet there’s even more to this kind of argument quoted above: the implication that only Israel is responsible for the peace process’s poor prospects and a Palestinian rejection of a two-state solution, and only now is it happening.

(more…)

Facts and anti-facts

Monday, January 12th, 2009

Anti-Israel propaganda often operates by generating anti-facts, which are then believed by the media, told and retold until everybody believes them. By the time Israeli sources deny them, it’s too late; the media don’t give much — or any — space to the denials.

For example, there’s the story that Israeli tanks attacked an aid convoy, killing a Palestinian driver and wounding two others.  And the one about the Jabalya UNRWA school. In both cases, most media outlets have presented the Palestinian  version of the events. And it is turning out that this version is not correct.

There are others. Anything the Palestinians, UN officials, or Mads Gilbert says is given immediate publicity (usually, but not always, with attribution) and Israeli denials mentioned as afterthoughts, if at all. And there is never a discussion of the veracity or lack thereof of the UN or Gilbert.

Probably the biggest anti-fact is the figure presented for civilian casualties.   NPR this morning reported that “dozens of Palestinians were killed over the weekend, with many of them women or children”. Their reporter “on the ground” — but not in Gaza — said,

United Nations officials say of the close to 900 Palestinians killed in two weeks of war 40% are women and children. More than 3700 Palestinians have been injured, and more than half of those are women and children, according to Maxwell Gaylard, the UN’s chief coordinator of humanitarian aid. [Gaylard then speaks, saying that civilians are “bearing the brunt” of the conflict]. — NPR

Gaylard receives his information from UNRWA personnel in Gaza, 99% of whom are Palestinians and all of whom do and say what Hamas tells them to.

These anti-facts are repeated over and over in the ‘neutral’ media (anti-Israel sources like KPFA go much farther, accusing the IDF of war crimes and genocide daily). There is very little discussion of the facts that Hamas soldiers are fighting in civilian clothes, using civilians as shields, crippling Fatah supporters so they won’t be tempted to ‘help Israel’, stealing goods intended as aid for Gaza residents, and of course continuing to fire rockets at Israel’s population. All of these activities are war crimes.

If you take into consideration the fact that it is in Israel’s interest to reduce civilian casualties and Hamas’ to increase them — especially their own — then both Hamas’ actions and its statements (transmitted via the UN) make perfect sense.

Like matter and anti-matter, facts and anti-facts annihilate each other when they touch. Many people that I talk to will take the ‘pox on both of your houses’ approach, or say “the truth is halfway in between”. And those who listen to KPFA (etc.) have by now been inoculated to resist facts; since they believe that Israel is totally evil, anything said on Israel’s behalf is a priori false.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Hamas shot the truckers and Chris Gunness is a liar

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

What did I tell you (“Did Hamas shoot Palestinian truckers?“)?

The IDF was not responsible for the death of a Palestinian aid worker contracted to the UN and the wounding of two others on Thursday, the IDF Spokesman said Saturday.

“An IDF investigation has found that it was not the army who fired on a UN truck at the Erez crossing,” the IDF Spokesman’s Office said. The IDF is not sure who fired on the truck, and is still investigating.

“The army further wishes to point out that the Palestinian wounded were evacuated by the Red Cross to the Israeli border, where they were taken by Israeli medical personnel for treatment at Ashkelon’s Barzilai Hospital,” the IDF told The Jerusalem Post…

The version of events that claimed the IDF had attacked the aid convoy was widely disseminated in the global media, and it was only on Friday afternoon that the IDF posited a different theory...

Foreign press reports [based on UNRWA statements — ed.] said the dead Palestinian and two others were hit by tank shells. A MDA medic at the scene told the Post that soldiers in the field said Hamas snipers targeted the aid workers. A Post probe revealed that the two wounded Palestinians were being treated at Barzilai for gunshot wounds [not shrapnel from tank shells — ed.].

Reacting to the IDF’s assertion that it did not fire on the UN convoy last Thursday, UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness said the UN “was careful to source its information from eyewitnesses on the ground.”

Gunness added that the UN was keen to “clear the fog of war” and get to the bottom of the incident. — Jerusalem Post (my emphasis)

1. Great job, Jerusalem Post!

2. UNRWA is in no way impartial.

3. I’ve heard Chris Gunness interviewed on NPR. He is vehemently anti-Israel.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

How it must end

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

No matter how well the IDF does in this war, the ultimate outcome will depend on the end-game. Chances are it will not be ended by every last Hamas operative being killed or captured, so we know there will be some kind of settlement, some kind of agreement between Israel and…somebody. What would an acceptable settlement look like?

Ending the Gaza War: Choices, not Solutions

By Barry Rubin

Last December, Hamas unilaterally ended its ceasefire with Israel and escalated the kind of cross-border attacks continually attempted even during the ceasefire. With massive public support, Israel struck back against a neighboring regime which daily attacked its citizens and called for its extermination.

For decades, Israel’s history shows a general pattern: its neighbors attack, Israel responds, Israel wins the war, and the world rushes to ensure that its victory is limited or nullified. If, as sometimes happens, the diplomatic process really improves the situation and provides progress for peace that, of course, is beneficial.

Yet Israel’s experience has shown that international promises made in return for its material concessions are often broken. Most recently, in 2006 the international community pledged to keep Hizballah out of south Lebanon and curb its arms supply, failed totally, yet took no action in response to this defeat. Israel is understandably skeptical.

In addition, Israelis know that Hamas is totally dedicated to their personal and collective destruction. The group will not moderate, cannot be bought off, and will not respect any agreement it makes. As a result, the usual kinds of diplomatic tools — concessions, confidence-building, agreements, moderation resulting from having governmental responsibilities, will not work. Any solution short of Hamas’ fall from power will bring more fighting in future.

What should happen is that the international community cooperates in the removal of the Hamas regime. It is an illegal government, brought to power by an unprovoked war against the Palestinian Authority (PA) which was the internationally recognized regime in the Gaza Strip. Hamas may have won the elections but it then seized total power, suspended representative government, and destroyed the opposition.

Moreover, Hamas is a radical terrorist group which openly uses antisemitic rhetoric and actively seeks to wipe Israel off the map. It oppresses the Palestinian population and leads them into endless war. It teaches young Palestinians that their career goal should not be as a teacher, engineer, or doctor but as a suicide bomber.

From a strategic standpoint, Hamas is a member of the Iran-Syria alliance which seeks to overthrow every Arab regime in the Middle East and replace it with an anti-Western, war-oriented, radical Islamist dictatorship. Hamas’ survival is a big threat to both Western interests and to those of Arab nationalist regimes. Keeping Hamas in power is equivalent to an energetic Western diplomatic effort to have kept the Taliban regime in power in Afghanistan, despite its role in the September 11 attacks.

If, however, the world is not going to support Hamas’ fall from office, Israel cannot bring about this result by itself.  At the same time, the world will be making a big mistake if it pushes for a ceasefire at any price, thus encouraging future violence and terrorism, not only regarding Gaza but also in the region generally.

Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition), with Walter Laqueur (Viking-Penguin); the paperback edition of The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan); A Chronological History of Terrorism, with Judy Colp Rubin, (Sharpe); and The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley). To read and subscribe to MERIA and other GLORIA Center publications or to order books, visit http://www.gloriacenter.org.

Technorati Tags: , ,