Archive for February, 2007

Move the embassy

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

Bradley Burston wrote in Ha’aretz that the American embassy should stay in Tel Aviv. Stripped to the bone, here’s the heart of his argument:

True, Israel needs recognition. But Israel and its western half of Jerusalem have survived, and thrived, without it for nearly 60 years. Recognition can wait.

What cannot wait is the possibility of diplomacy between Israel and the Palestinians…

West Jerusalem will not be recognized as the capital of the Jewish state, until East Jerusalem becomes the capital of an independent Palestine.

There will not be a solution without a Palestinian state. There will be no Palestinian state without a share of Jerusalem as a recognized capital.

It may be true that there will not be a solution until there is a Palestinian state. It may also be true that there will not be a solution.

However, it is certainly true that there will not be a solution until the Jewish state receives the same treatment as every other state. There is no other state in the world which has been in existence for almost 60 years whose legitimacy (or that of its capital) is considered tenuous.

Burston says that moving the embassy would be “kicking the Palestinans while they’re down”. Why? Do the Palestinians have a legitimate claim on West Jerusalem? Does anyone who wants a fair two-state solution think that it will require Israel to move the Knesset to Tel Aviv?

Burston talks about Morton Klein’s ambitions and the Republicans’ desire for pro-Israel votes. But he doesn’t mention the influence of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on successive US administrations.

The US embassy should be moved to Jerusalem regardless of what the antisemitic supporters of terrorism in Riyadh say.

Technorati Tags: ,

Q&A with Bernard Lewis

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

Nobody knows the Mideast better than Bernard Lewis. Today’s Jerusalem Post has a long interview, which I found fascinating. For example:

If you go back to the Egyptian peace process, Sadat didn’t decide to make peace because he was suddenly convinced of the merits of the Zionist case. Sadat decided to make peace because he realized that Egypt was becoming a Soviet colony.

The process was very visible. There were whole areas of Soviet bases and no Egyptian was admitted. Sadat, I think, realized that on the best estimate of Israel’s power and the worst estimate of Israel’s intentions, Israel was not a threat to Egypt in the way that the Soviet Union was.

So he took the very courageous step of ordering the Soviet specialists out of Egypt, facing the danger they might do what they did in Czechoslovakia or Hungary. They didn’t, fortunately. Then he hoped that Washington would help him, instead of which Washington produced the Vance-Gromyko Agreement, a sort of diplomatic carve up, in effect giving Egypt back to the Soviets. That was [former president Jimmy] Carter’s real contribution to the peace process. All the rest of it is imaginary; imaginary is the polite word. [My emphasis — ed.]

That persuaded Sadat that he had to go to the Israelis.

Daniel Pipes and the barbarians

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

I recall sitting in a local Interfaith Alliance meeting a couple of years ago. Pipes’ name came up, and he was immediately dismissed scornfully as an ‘islamophobe’.

Nothing I’ve read by Pipes or heard him say indicates that he hates Muslims or despises Islam. On the contrary, he is knowledgeable about Islam and obviously wishes that radical Islamism had not become its public face. And unlike most who write and speak about the Mideast conflict, Pipes uses logic and reason.

Logic and reason, however, are not on the side of the Palestinians and their supporters. So he gets on their nerves.

In any event, he spoke recently at UC Irvine, where his talk was disrupted by anti-Israel student barbarians. You can read about it and link to videos of the event on Pipes’ own blog.

I especially recommend the shorter video that includes the protestors’ leader talking to his group at the very end. It’s chilling.

Update [4 Feb. 1456 PST]: LGF has excerpted the interesting part of the video and also provided a printed transcript.

Technorati Tags: ,

Palestinians break silence, too

Thursday, February 1st, 2007

The controversy about the campus organization UPZ and its sponsorship of ‘Breaking the Silence’ apparently isn’t over. If you don’t know by now,

Breaking the Silence … is a group of former IDF combat soldiers, many of whom continue to do reserve duty, who give personal testimony of purported human rights violations perpetrated by the IDF in Judea and Samaria.

“We try to explain to audiences on college campuses what it feels like to stand for hours at a checkpoint in the territories telling someone twice our age that he cannot go where he wants to because of a decision by some high-ranking official,” said Mikhael Manekin, administrative director of Breaking the Silence. “Or what an IDF soldier feels after breaking in to a Palestinian family’s house in the middle of the night and arresting the father while his children scream and cry.”

Manekin, 27, an IDF lieutenant who still does reserve duty in Judea and Samaria, said that he has testimony from 400 soldiers who have served in Judea and Samaria. “All of them talk of the ethical and moral dilemmas they faced while on duty.”

What nobody seems to know is that there’s a Palestinian counterpart to ‘Breaking the Silence’: a group of former terrorists militants who still murder Jews Resist the Occupation from time to time. They too struggle with the duties they are required to perform:

“You have to understand that we face difficult moral issues in our work. Think about what it must be like to drive around all day looking for a Zionist to shoot; and then, when we shoot one, he turns out to be an Arab! Arafat himself had to apologize for that one.”

“Consider how it feels, for example, to break down the door of a Jewish home and machine-gun a mother and her children in their beds — only to find that the father was away at Zionist reserve duty that night! Let me tell you, you are not the only ones with ethical concerns.”

We at FresnoZionism had no idea that the other side was as morally conflicted as we are. Therefore, I propose that we send them on a campus tour as well, so that American students can see the thoughtful, tender and poetic nature of the Palestinian Freedom Fighters for themselves.

Technorati Tags: , ,

…and speaking of genocide

Thursday, February 1st, 2007

The Jewish Telegraph reported that the city council of Bolton, in greater Manchester, canceled a planned event last weekend marking the U.N.-designated international Holocaust memorial day.

The city has marked the Holocaust for the past three years. Instead, in line with the policy of the Muslim Council of Britain, which rejects the memorial day, the city will have a Genocide Day in June that also will mark supposed “ongoing genocide and human rights abuses of Palestinians” by Israelis. — JTA

They’ll probably have a Genocide Day picnic too.