Archive for June, 2007

There’s no substitute for motivation

Tuesday, June 12th, 2007

Fatah may be finished in Gaza:

Hamas launched a full-scale attack Tuesday afternoon against Fatah security bases and positions in Gaza, and succeeded in taking over a number of them, Israel Radio reported.

Hamas-affiliated television said that the organization overtook the entire northern section of the Gaza Strip. After airing the report, the station was attacked by PA security forces and forced to play pro-Fatah songs…

Less then an hour after the attack, Abbas called for an immediate cease-fire…

Also on Tuesday afternoon, Fatah announced that within several hours, the faction would decide whether to stay in the unity government with Hamas, or leave the Palestinian Authority government altogether, Israel Radio reported.

The announcement coincided with a Hamas attack on the National Security headquarters in Gaza, an incident which followed a recent threat of such action by the extremist Islamic faction. National Security is one of the armed forces affiliated with Fatah.

Hamas also announced that Fatah must evacuate all buildings used by Military Intelligence, the Revolutionary Guard, National Security and Preventive Security. — Jerusalem Post

Hamas has consistently beaten Fatah militarily. There’s no substitute for motivation, even large amounts of American aid — just look at Iraq (or, historically, Vietnam).

If Fatah leaves the government, there will be no way for the EU or the US to fund Palestinian terrorism without admitting that they are funding Palestinian terrorism. Personally, I’d like to see the fig leaf stripped away, especially since Fatah is also a terrorist organization.

The US will do its best to keep Fatah in the government. We’ll soon find out if this is possible, and how much it will cost.

Update [1936 PDT]: Fatah has really gotten its clock cleaned in Gaza. Welcome to Hamastan!

Update [2110 PDT]: 37 are dead in two days of fighting. Hamas has captured large amounts of US-supplied  weapons and ammunition from Fatah, as everyone knew would happen. I hope that the idiotic idea of intervening on behalf of Fatah does not get any play in Israel — and that the US does not try to push Israel in this direction.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Palestinian idealism

Monday, June 11th, 2007

Ami Ayalon and Sari Nusseibeh’s peace plan (as summarized by Bradley Burston, original here):

The borders of the new state would be based on 1967 lines, with a territorial exchange allowing for Israel to annex major settlement blocs and an equal amount of area to be granted Palestine from areas now within Israel proper. No settlers would remain within Palestine.

The Palestinian state would be demilitarized, under agreements in which the international community would guarantee its security.

Regarding the right of return, “Palestinians refugees will return only to the State of Palestine; Jews will return only to the State of Israel.” In addition, Israel, Palestine, and the international community would set up a fund to compensate Palestinian refugees for their suffering.

As for Jerusalem, the Palestinians would have sovereignty over Arab neighborhoods, and Israel over Jewish neighborhoods. Neither side would have sovereignty over holy sites. Israel would act as guardian of the Western wall, Palestine as guardian of the Noble Sanctuary mosque compound.

I don’t want to talk about the justice or fairness of the plan. Just a couple of guesses about how such a plan would be received by Israelis and Palestinians:

My first guess is that if they were convinced that security guarantees would be effective (a very big ‘if’), the majority of Israelis would accept such a plan.

My other guess is that no imaginable Palestinian leadership would accept it.

Historically, since the 1937 Peel Commission and through the 2000 Clinton/Barak proposal, Israelis have been prepared to accept partition, even when it would be objectively disadvantageous, on the grounds that it would bring peace. Israelis who think that the entire Land of Israel should be in Jewish hands for religious reasons are a minority.

Most Arabs have always opposed partition. It has always seemed to them — even before the founding of the state — that the entire land belonged to them, indeed, that any land held by Jews was in some sense stolen (even if it was purchased). Compensation has never been considered an acceptable substitute for possession.

There is a fundamental asymmetry in the thinking of Israelis and Palestinians. Israelis are mostly pragmatic and most of them are more interested in peace than land. Indeed, opposition to withdrawal from the territories is overwhelmingly based on security considerations.

Palestinians are not pragmatic, they are idealistic. They are prepared to undergo great hardship in order to obtain what they think is theirs, and they are uncompromising. Even this proposal, signed by the moderate Nusseibeh — and if there ever was a moderate Palestinian, it’s Nusseibeh — has to take Palestinian idealism into account.

I’m referring, of course, to the statement at the end of the first paragraph: No settlers will remain in Palestine. Although one presumes that both sides envisage that Arabs will continue to live in Israel, the idealistic Palestinians require that Palestine must be completely Judenrein.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Whose side are they on?

Monday, June 11th, 2007

It would be crude to ask Arab Knesset members “whose side are you on?”, but sometimes one feels that it’s appropriate.

Arab MKs were infuriated Monday morning by the appearance of Reform Party of Syria leader Farid Ghadry at the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee [FADC].

“Ghadry decided to act against his people and his country, and chose to be a mercenary for Americans,” Hadash Chairman Muhammad Barakei argued.

“He came to act as a wretched servant for the belligerent agenda and the extreme right wing. Scum is bad, but American scum of this kind is much worse,” Barakei added.

MK Ahmed Tibi (UAL) stopped Ghadry in the Kneseet corridor and accosted him in Arabic: “Aren’t you ashamed? You should be ashamed, coming here as a cheap pawn of [Likud Chairman Binyamin] Netanyahu. — Jerusalem Post

So what outrage did Ghadry commit to deserve this?

Ghadry clearly stated on Sunday that he still believed that the Golan Heights belonged to Syria and he planned to make a point of it during the FADC meeting.

Ghadry told an audience at the Harry Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace at the Hebrew University that Israel should refrain from making peace with Syria’s current dictatorship until its leadership becomes a democracy.

“Syria will become democratic, have patience … Peace with a non-democratic Syria … is perilous and short-sighted.”

I might add that returning the Golan Heights to a Syria which is not only non-democratic, but engaged in a huge military buildup — as well as sponsoring and supplying Hezbollah in its own war preparations — would be foolhardy in the extreme. One doesn’t need to be a member of the “extreme right-wing” to see this!

Like former MK Azmi Bishara, who fled the country following accusations of espionage on behalf of Syria during the Lebanon war, his colleagues apparently feel that their interests lie closer to those of Syria than Israel.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

The US arms and finances Palestinian terrorism

Sunday, June 10th, 2007

I am beyond words:

Some of the Palestinian gunmen who participated in the kidnapping of IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Schalit last year have long been on the payroll of the Palestinian Authority, Palestinian sources revealed Sunday.

The sources named two of the suspected kidnappers as Muhammad Azmi Farawneh and Majdi Tayseer Hammad…

Farawneh is believed to have played a key role in the abduction of Schalit. Hammad was the commander of the Nasser Salah Eddin Brigades, the armed wing of the Popular Resistance Committees – one of the groups that claimed responsibility for the kidnapping.

The two were killed a few weeks after the abduction in air strikes launched by the IAF in the Gaza Strip.

The fact that they have been on the payroll of the PA was disclosed after their families protested against the low pension that the PA has decided to allocate them…

The PA has also been paying salaries to thousands of Fatah gunmen belonging to the faction’s armed wing, the Aksa Martyrs Brigades. The majority of these gunmen are registered as members of various branches of the PA security forces, particularly the General Intelligence, Force 17 and the Preventive Security Service. But until now it was not common knowledge that members of the Popular Resistance Committees had also been receiving salaries from the PA.

The Popular Resistance Committees is an alliance of various armed factions in the Gaza Strip, including Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. The group was also behind the roadside bomb attack that killed three US security guards in the northern Gaza Strip in 2003.

Khaled Abu Toameh, Jerusalem Post

The US continues to funnel millions of dollars and large quantities of arms to the PA to pay the salaries of these ‘security’ forces and to ‘strengthen Palestinian moderates’.

My tax dollars are arming and paying terrorists to kidnap and murder Israelis and Americans!

Technorati Tags:

A message to the press that covers the Mideast

Sunday, June 10th, 2007

In April, the largest union of British Journalists voted to boycott Israeli goods. At that time BBC reporter Alan Johnston had been a prisoner in Gaza for about a month, and he’s still not out.

Jeep used in attackYesterday, the Islamic Jihad organization showed its appreciation of continued support for the Palestinian cause by most of the world news media by using a jeep camouflaged to look like a press vehicle in order to attempt to carry out an attack (probably another kidnapping) against an Israeli position.

Here is my message for journalists and others who support the Palestinian and other jihadist causes:

Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other such groups, in addition to being murderous terrorists, do not respect concepts like access to information, a free press, or indeed a free anything. Any part of the world that they inhabit becomes a kind of hell permeated by thuggery and intolerance. They cynically manipulate and take advantage of democratic and enlightened traditions in places like Israel to try to destroy them.

So when you ‘tell the story’ of the poor, persecuted Palestinians (whose terrorist militias are supported by the jihadist oil superpowers of Saudi Arabia and Iran), keep in mind that you might end up kidnapped like the unfortunate Johnston, or as the unintended target of an Israeli tank.

And keep in mind that Europe and North America are next.

Technorati Tags: , , ,