Archive for the ‘General’ Category

Olmert’s summit proposal makes a statement

Sunday, April 1st, 2007

PM Olmert has responded to the Arab initiative (see my take on the Arab initiative here) by proposing a summit:

In his first public reaction to the Arab League summit’s relaunching of its 2002 peace initiative last week, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Sunday night invited the heads of the Arab states to a conference where these and other ideas would be discussed…

He said it was clear that each side would be able to bring its positions to such a meeting, alluding to Israel’s stance that the Arab peace initiative was a starting point for negotiations, not the finish line…

Olmert said there was a “significant gap” between the Israeli and Arab positions, but that “in a correct, responsible and careful process we can move forward toward negotiations.” — Jerusalem Post

It’s certain that the Arab leaders will not accept this. First, they see their proposal as too magnanimous already, since it gives lip service (albeit no more) to the continued existence of a state of Israel. So they feel that they have gone as far as they can, and now it’s up to Israel to accept the proposal or else (and I think the implication of the ‘or else’ is ultimately war).

Second, they will not accept any proposal that is an Israeli proposal, because to do so would be to admit that Israel is as much a legitimate nation as the Arab states. Their view of Israel is analagous to Israel’s view, for example, of Hamas: an entity so illegitimate that even to talk with it is out of the ordinary. To accept Israel’s proposal is to put themselves on the same level as Israel.

And third, they believe that Israel’s strategic position is weak after the Lebanon war, and her ally the US can be pressured because of the Iraq situation. Therefore they feel that she can be forced to accept their terms (and if not, nothing is lost).

Olmert’s initiative does have an important function, however. By presenting an alternative that no-one (except the Arab states) should see as unreasonable, Israel makes it clear that she is not the obstacle to peace in the region. Although it’s highly unlikely that anything will come of it, the statement that it makes needs to be emphasized. It’s also possible that Israel’s strategic position will improve, at which point it could provide a basis for real talks.

Update [2 APR 1015 PDT]:

[an anonymous] Saudi official told The Associated Press that “before any meeting could be considered,” Israel should accept the 2002 Arab peace initiative that would recognize Israel in exchange for withdrawal from captured territory and a just solution for the Palestinian refugees. — AP (Yahoo)

No surprises.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

The BBC vs. Socrates

Saturday, March 31st, 2007

The following is a piece of a Socratic dialog, from an article by Israel Zwick. As a former student of Philosophy, I absolutely love it! Socrates is the guy from the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs (IMFA). You’ll recognize the other guy.

(more…)

Olmert, security heads, disagree on outcome of Lebanon war

Saturday, March 31st, 2007

Yes, I know I said something nice about PM Olmert yesterday. But now I need to make up for it. Here is what he told the Israeli Newspaper Yediot Aharonot yesterday:

Israel won last summer’s war with Hizbullah despite a hailstorm of criticism by the Israeli public of the army’s poor performance, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told Ynet in a special Passover interview.

“I say we had positive results in Lebanon, we had big achievements, we won this war and we were also exposed to some weaknesses,” the prime minister said. “I think that eventually this will be the historical judgment, and I will get credit for that.” — Ehud Olmert (YNet)

But he should know better:

Mossad Chief Meir Dagan and Shin Bet Chief Yuval Diskin arrived at the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem shortly after the war…[and told him that] the war was a national catastrophe and Israel suffered a critical blow.” — YNet

Olmert actually said in another interview that not only did Israel win, but everything went exactly as he had planned:

So, from the outset, the ambition was not to take over a territory or to cross the area. The strategy was to establish pressure that would create the involvement of international forces to force the army of Lebanon to take over the South. That was the purpose of the war. Look at the statement I made on the 17th of July, and the cabinet announcement of the 19th of July. From the beginning, we were not interested in the typical knock-out kind of victory which doesn’t exist when you fight against terrorists. [The aim] was the arrangement that had to be approved by the Lebanese government, and to be drafted and phrased properly by the United States and the members of the Security Council. And that’s what we did. — Jerusalem Post

Right.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Can we be critical of jihadists?

Saturday, March 31st, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

The UN Human Rights Commission suggests that freedom of speech can go too far:

(more…)

Cynicism you can cut with a knife

Saturday, March 31st, 2007

The EU is optimistic about the possibility of Mideast peace, says the Jerusalem Post. The only problem is that one of the parties refuses to even lie about preferring war:

Still, they have faced a dilemma over how to deal with the newly formed Palestinian unity government – a coalition between Hamas and the more moderate Fatah of Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. Its platform falls short of international demands that it recognize Israel, renounce violence and abide by existing Palestinian-Israel agreements.

On Saturday, the Europeans agreed they will judge the new government by its actions rather than its words and progressively help it build up credible government institutions

The cynicism is thick enough to cut with a knife.

The new government’s actions consist of preparing for war by stockpiling smuggled arms, building and firing rockets, developing new kinds of rockets, and constructing Lebanon-like fortifications in Gaza. They are also continuing incitement against Israel in schools, mosques, media, and every other institution.

In fact, it’s impossible to find either actions or words of peace coming from this ‘government’ that we in the West are paying for.

Technorati Tags: , ,