A pro-active plan for peace

March 22nd, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

US and Israeli diplomats have suggested that the Saudi plan might be a good starting point for peace negotiations with some modifications — for example, the demand for a right of return of Palestinian refugees to Israel has to be removed.

The problem is a lot deeper than that, though. The Palestinians and other Arabs view any compromise as a defeat, and would only agree to it as a temporary tactical move. In their view, Israel is totally at fault for the history of conflict in the region, the situation of the refugees, etc. So any peace agreement has to include Israel completely undoing the ‘unnatural’ situation by giving up any territory taken from Arab hands, restoring all that they lost to the refugees, etc. Naturally, an independent state of Israel would not survive such a deal.

Read the rest of this entry »

Iran: we’re serious

March 22nd, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

If the US or Israel will attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, it is expected to be soon:

Read the rest of this entry »

Dear RedFox

March 21st, 2007

An American middle school student had to write a paper on the subject “Who is at Fault in the Middle East”? One can imagine that he would have been somewhat overwhelmed by the amount of material available, and the widely varying points of view. Our contributor Naomi Leitner gave him her take. It’s long for a blog post, but short for a history of the Jewish state! Ms. Leitner is an attorney in Israel.

Dear “RedFox”:

A friend of mine passed your e-mail along to me and I’ll try to answer, in the way that I and many Israelis see our history.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jews and Christians for and against Zion

March 21st, 2007

Isi Leibler, chair of the Diaspora-Israel Relations Committee of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA), writes:

In view of the fact that demonstrating hatred of Israel has become a key prerequisite for eligibility to membership of the “progressive” camp, one finds Jews at the forefront of the vicious campaigns demonizing Israel in virtually every country.

Yet to accuse these renegades of indulging in self-hatred is considered as a cardinal sin in many circles. It is thus legitimate for Jews to defame Israel as an “apartheid state,” accuse their kinsmen of behaving like Nazis, apply double-standards to Israeli behavior, accuse Israel of ethnic cleansing, war crimes, even genocide; it’s even acceptable to call for dismantling Israel and replacing it with a binational state, or to support the “right of return” for Arab refugees – all in the name of communal tolerance.

Yet to stand up and brand such views as extremist is deemed an expression of “Zionist McCarthyism.”

It is a pathetic reflection of our times that people such as Tony Judt, Marc Ellis, Norman Finkelstein, Jacqueline Rose and Tony Kushner are considered martyrs, and tolerance of their malicious efforts to delegitimize the Jewish state has become confused with freedom of expression.

What a red herring. Insisting that Jewish demonizers of Israel comprise an extremist fringe and speak only for themselves does not represent suppression of free speech. — Jews against Zion (Jerusalem Post)

Although there have always been anti-Zionist Jews, the present circumstance of so many high-profile Jewish intellectuals giving more than just aid and comfort to those who not only want there to not be a Jewish state, but who also wish to kill the Jews, is unprecedented.

Read the rest of this entry »

The unthinkable becomes thinkable

March 21st, 2007

By Vic Rosenthal

Little by little, the unthinkable becomes thinkable, and then practical, and then it happens. And then something even more unthinkable starts to be thought.

At one time, it was against the law in Israel to even talk to a representative of the PLO. Then somebody did it, and soon it became official and soon Arafat — Arafat! — was shaking hands with the Prime Minister. And soon he was actually paid to set up shop in Gaza and Ramallah, where this remarkably evil and duplicitous man stuffed his Swiss bank accounts, built an educational and media system designed to create martyrs in the jihad against Israel, and pretended to talk peace at the same time that he was paying his terrorist minions to kill Jews.

At one time, Israelis and Jews throughout the world vowed that the blood that was shed in 1967 to regain the Old City of Jerusalem would not be dishonored. In 2000, Barak offered control of the Temple Mount to Arafat. In 2007, sovereignty over it has all but officially passed into the hands of the Palestinians.

At one time, only the extreme Left considered a Palestinian state in the territories an option. Today, the US President endorses the idea, but the Arabs and the Left have moved on to talk about a single, “binational” state.

At one time, the West overwhelmingly supported Israel’s right to exist. Today, it’s a subject for debate.

Technorati Tags: