Archive for the ‘General’ Category

A surrender agreement

Monday, October 8th, 2007

Benjamin NetanyahuSecret negotiations regarding a ‘peace’ agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (as represented by Mahmoud Abbas) are continuing, and so are leaks about what is being offered. Jerusalem will somehow be divided, much of the West Bank will come under Palestinian control, and something — no-one knows for sure what — will be done in regard to the descendants of Palestinian refugees.

The problem is that Abbas has absolutely no ability to deliver anything in return from the Palestinians, and even less from the other parties in the conflict. Even if he wanted to, which is in dispute, he cannot prevent terrorism from areas which are not under IDF control, and he cannot prevent a Hamas takeover there either.

So while opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu can list all of the likely consequences of the planned concessions, nobody can tell us how Abbas or anyone else can guarantee — or even make likely — any kind of peace afterwards.

Indeed, based on Palestinian reactions to previous concessions, we can expect the opposite.

In addition, supposing that such a deal is made, will Iran agree that Israel can be allowed to exist? Will Hezbollah stop preparing for another rocket war? Will Syria stand down her chemical-warhead tipped missiles? Will Hamas stop its arms smuggling, rocket firing, and war preparations?

A peace agreement would be a two-sided deal, with both sides making concessions and some kind of guarantee that there would be peace. What is being talked about is something different entirely:

A surrender agreement.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Gaza terrorists get better rockets

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

A Katyusha rocket has landed in Netivot, near the Gaza strip:

The rocket, one of four to land in the western Negev, was the first to land in the Netivot area since Palestinian terrorists started firing rockets at Israel.

Defense officials said that the rocket was Russian-made and had a range of 20 kilometers.

No one was wounded and no damage was reported as a result of the rocket barrage.

Netivot Mayor Yehiel Zohar said that his request to fortify the town’s education institutions was turned down since Netivot is located 11 kilometers from the Gaza Strip – one kilometer outside the area that qualifies for fortification. — Jerusalem Post

Netivot is a small town. The city of Ashkelon (population 117,000), however, is even closer to the Gaza strip, and has a port and industrial installations. Some Qassams have already struck it, but so far have not done too much damage. Katyushas, with longer range, better accuracy, and larger payloads, would be another story.

I assume they are being smuggled in via the arms superhighway under the Egyptian border. There will come a point that Israel will be forced to take action. I hope it won’t have to be prompted by a major casualty event.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

What the Palestinians really want

Saturday, October 6th, 2007

If you want an honest statement of the Palestinian position free of the usual posturing, look no further:

In a letter to [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas, Salman Abu Sitta, a prominent spokesman for Palestinian refugees, wrote: “We are aware of the pressure you are facing to abandon the Palestinian position and endorse Israel’s vision. But what has drawn our attention more than anything else is Israel’s attempt to redefine the idea of the two-state solution. Israel now wants mutual recognition – Israel as the national homeland of the Jews and, on what’s left of the land, Palestine as the national homeland of the Palestinians.”

Abu Sitta described the Israeli formula as “extremely dangerous,” saying it should be rejected by all Arabs. He said accepting this formula would be tantamount to abandoning the Arab right to Palestine and accepting the Jews’ ostensible historical and biblical rights to the land.

In addition, Abu Sitta argued, the Israeli stance abolishes the right of return for Palestinians on two levels: recognition of this right and its fulfillment.

“This would constitute a historic burden; no Palestinian could bear its consequences in front of his people and history,” he cautioned. He said it was inconceivable that the Palestinians would abandon the right of return after decades of fighting. — Khaled Abu Toameh, Jerusalem Post [my emphasis]

And all this time, proponents of a two-state solution have been arguing that the problem is that the correct formula for compromise hasn’t been found yet. They suggest that the Clinton-Barak proposals failed because Israel did not offer enough or because Arafat wasn’t ready for peace.

The real problem is that Israelis and Americans have never really paid attention to what Palestinians say, or have never believed that they actually meant it.

The Palestinians believe a false version of history. They are wrong about the connection of the Jews to the land, they are wrong about the history of the 19th and 20th centuries, and they are especially wrong about their understanding of the events of 1948.

In addition to being mistaken about what actually happened, they are totally blind to their own agency in bringing about their situation. They don’t take responsibility for the actions of al-Husseini (the Nazi Mufti of Jerusalem), Yasser Arafat, Hamas, or any number of murderers and terrorists.

But never mind, this is the version of reality that they believe, with the passion that only a truly miserable people can muster. And this misery has been carefully nurtured over the years by the Arab nations, the UNRWA which was created just for this purpose (and mostly paid for by the US), and the sympathetic international Left which has adopted their cause.

So they have never been, and are not now, willing to accept a compromise solution that leaves room for a Jewish state.

But this should not be Israel’s problem. Why should Israel have to pay for the perfidy of the British and French, the stupidity of al-Husseini, the evil and corruption of Arafat, the grandiose plans of Nasser, the machinations of the Assads, and the fact that the Palestinians have been lied to so thoroughly by themselves and others?

The responsibility for solving the problems of the descendants of the Arab refugees of 1948 should fall on those who really created and perpetuated the problem. Since the UN has entire departments and ‘divisions’ dedicated to Palestinian rights, since it has had several ‘human rights’ bodies that dealt with little else, maybe it could come up with an answer.

Such a solution would involve the abolition of UNRWA, compensation for the treatment these people have received from their ‘host’ nations since 1948, education and job-training programs, and finally resettlement in the host nations or ‘Palestine’ if such an entity is ultimately created — which of course will ultimately be up to the Palestinians themselves.

Technorati Tags: ,

Three lessons of the Yom Kippur War

Friday, October 5th, 2007

Hosni MubarakMubarak:

“Israel hasn’t learned the lessons of the Yom Kippur War and it prefers to solve its problems by force rather than by peaceful means” — Jerusalem Post

Of course the lessons of the Yom Kippur War are exactly the opposite. After the 1967 war Israel wanted to ‘solve its problems’ peacefully, but the Arabs responded with the “Three No’s” (no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it).

Forty years on, there have been negotiations with a few Arab countries, and some form of recognition from even fewer. If true peace is to be distinguished from a US-paid-for cease-fire, then Israel has peace with just one Arab country, Jordan. So lesson one was that the Arabs, mostly, are not interested in peace.

Lesson two is that the Arab states will attack Israel if they think they will succeed. So permanent military preparedness and good intelligence are essential for survival.

And lesson three is this: if Egypt is building up her army and buying tanks and planes, it’s not for directing traffic in Cairo.

Technorati Tags: , ,

He really does want to wipe Israel off the map

Friday, October 5th, 2007

Iranian anti-Israel agitation is heating up:

Millions of Iranians attended nationwide rallies Friday in support of the Palestinians, while the country’s hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Israel’s continued existence was an “insult to human dignity.”

“The creation, continued existence and unlimited (Western) support for this regime is an insult to human dignity,” Ahmadinejad said. “The occupation of Palestine is not limited to one land. The Zionist issue is now a global issue” …

In the capital Teheran, hundreds of thousands of people poured into the streets as they chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” Some protesters also burned American and Israeli flags. — Jerusalem Post

Why does he care, actually? Is his hatred of Israel a result of his love for the Palestinians? I doubt it, since Iranian-backed Shiites are busily torturing and killing Palestinians in Iraq. He could stop that in a minute if he wanted to.

Is he afraid that Israel will prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power? Israel does not, unfortunately, have the firepower to destroy Iran’s nuclear installations, and she is highly vulnerable to an Iranian counterattack. In this connection, he should be much more worried about the US, which has both the power and — because of the Iranian threat to Gulf oil producers — the motivation.

No, I think the reason is that Israel is a bone in Iran’s geopolitical throat. Iran envisions herself as the leader of a great Islamic caliphate, stretching all the way to the Mediterranean. Imagine Lebanon under the control of Hezbollah and Syria’s Alawite rulers (whom many do not even consider Muslim) replaced with a similar group. Israel, which would strongly and effectively oppose such changes, must be gotten out of the way before they can occur.

We also shouldn’t minimize the propaganda value of destroying Israel. I’m always amazed by the honest depth of hatred most Arabs and Muslims have for Israel. Older Americans may remember how ‘Communism’ was hated so passionately here in the 1950s. This possibly comes close to the feeling of the “Arab street”, although I think the combination of today’s powerful media and the lower educational levels in the Arab world compared to the West have made their feelings even stronger. Anyway, there’s no better way to win the hearts of this constituency than to credibly threaten Israel.

Iran’s main antagonists are the US and Saudi Arabia, and what they are struggling for is control of the oil resources of the Middle East, and the stranglehold on the world’s economy that this would provide. There is no more important prize in the world today.

Israel’s primary task at this moment is to oppose the Iranian proxies in the neighborhood — Hamas and Hezbollah, and Iran’s ally Syria. These represent the direct present threats to her security. It is to be hoped that the ‘big boys’ — the US, Saudi Arabia, the EU — will be worried enough about Iranian ambitions to take action.

Technorati Tags: ,