Some weeks ago, Michael Lerner of Tikkun wrote an article entitled “How the anti-Israel Left helps perpetuate the occupation“.
Lerner is an easy target, and indeed it wouldn’t be totally incorrect to include him in the “anti-Israel Left” that he talks about. I can’t resist pointing out that here we have Lerner, who claims to be pro-Israel, upset with anti-Israel people not because they advocate the replacement of Israel with an Arab state, but because they might (inadvertently) be pro-occupation. Is the continued occupation worse than the elimination of Israel?
What I do not understand about Lerner and other ‘pro-Israel’ people who are obsessed with ending the occupation, is what exactly they think Israel should do instead. I am willing to bet that if Israelis could push a button which would end the occupation of the West Bank without imperiling their lives or the existence of the state, a huge majority of them would push it in an eyeblink.
